League of Legends: The Ultimate Support Debate – Enchanters vs. Engagers

In League of Legends, the support role is typically divided into two categories—Enchanters and Engagers. This distinction helps streamline team communication and coordination, ensuring clarity in bot lane duos. But which one is the superior support playstyle? Both archetypes bring unique advantages to the table, and with the current meta keeping them evenly matched in pick rate and success, the debate is more relevant than ever.

Let’s break down Enchanters vs. Engagers, analyzing their strengths, weaknesses, and impact on the game.

Understanding the Support Archetypes

What Are Enchanter Supports?

Enchanters are defensive, buff-focused champions who empower their allies with heals, shields, movement speed, and stat boosts. They are commonly found in the controller subclass, with champions like Lulu, Nami, Janna, Milio, and Renata Glasc exemplifying the role.

Strengths of Enchanters

✅ Enhance teammates’ potential – They amplify their ADC’s power, increasing survivability and DPS.
✅ Scaling power – Their effectiveness grows over time as they continuously buff and protect carries.
✅ Peel and sustain – They provide strong crowd control, healing, and shields, ensuring allies stay alive.

Weaknesses of Enchanters

❌ Low individual agency – They rely on their team to perform well; they cannot carry fights on their own.
❌ Vulnerable to hard engage – Lacks mobility and durability, making them susceptible to dive compositions.
❌ Limited impact in chaotic fights – Can only buff one or two teammates at a time, struggling when fights are scattered.

What Are Engage Supports?

Engagers are aggressive, frontline champions who initiate fights with hard crowd control and tanky stats. They include Alistar, Leona, Nautilus, Blitzcrank, Rakan, and Thresh.

Strengths of Engagers

✅ Playmaking potential – Their ability to start fights gives them a high impact on game flow.
✅ Crowd control dominance – Can lock down multiple enemies, allowing allies to follow up.
✅ Strong lane presence – They dictate early trades with all-in potential and pressure.

Weaknesses of Engagers

❌ Risky decision-making – A bad engage can cost the team a fight or objective.
❌ Falls off if behind – Struggles when the enemy scales and out-damages them.
❌ High risk, high reward – Missing a critical ability like Thresh hook or Leona’s E can turn fights against them.

Which Support Archetype is Better?

The answer depends on the game’s context. Engagers thrive in early skirmishes and proactive plays, while Enchanters excel in protecting hyper-carries and extending fights.

However, engage supports generally have higher carry potential, as their crowd control can directly win fights and influence objectives. That’s why most Challenger support players favor playmaking champions over purely reactive Enchanters.

That being said, Enchanters shine in the late game, where their buffs and shields turn ADCs into unstoppable late-game monsters—something that can’t be matched by an Engager’s fixed-value crowd control.

Ultimately, the better archetype depends on the team composition, player skill, and game flow. What do you think? Which support type do you prefer?

For more League of Legends discussions, champion breakdowns, and meta analysis, visit LoLNOW.gg!